Government or culture to change?

Trenu Info
By -
0

Source: Gorkhapatra

After the reconstitution of the House of Representatives, new debates and debates are going on in the political arena. Since the Supreme Court has the right to make the final interpretation of the spirit and essence of the constitution, the decision should be upheld by all. The decision has also made the general public aware of the spirit of the constitution. Despite the judicial settlement of the disputed issue, the current political course does not look so easy. Perhaps its first audacity will begin with the practice of forcing Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to step down. A new series of instability will appear.

Scenario of instability

When the constitution was drafted in the United States in 1787, in France in 1791, in Argentina in 1852, in Austria in 1920, in Belgium in 1831, in Canada in 1867, in Denmark in 1849, the political situation there was as confusing as ours. Three decades ago, the Berlin Wall was torn down and Germany was reunited. It was around this time that the political map of the world changed after the partition of the Soviet Union. Based on this, a famous philosopher Francis Fukuyama wrote the book 'End of History and Last Min'. A new future was predicted on the stability of power centers in the world and the nature of the Cold War. But that is not the case. In our case too, the constitution and the governments have changed many times. Apart from the assurance that the days of the citizens would return, the culture of the party and the government did not change to a large extent. Instead of the concept of a stable and strong government for strategic progress, it was heard that the intention was to form and dismantle the government for the 'comfort' and convenience of others. The question of whether the citizens and their promotion is secondary is becoming natural. If they are dedicated to the people, the parties should focus on changing the culture rather than changing the government.

 Expected rites

Given the long-standing stability in Nepal's politics, at least the leadership should not lose consciousness. Even if the House of Representatives is revived, despair and frustration should not be revived. The republic is most comfortable when the ruling party is united for reform through healthy criticism and self-criticism. Disagreement, sarcasm and strong intolerance among the leadership shows the failure of not only the government and the ruling party but also the entire system. There is widespread frustration even among the people towards the republican system.

Strong political parties and the sophisticated political culture they present to the people play an important role in building a strong nation. Therefore, the reform and change of the system rather than the character and the culture should be the intensive practice of the parties. Brothers should be skeptical of the concept of bursting. Unstable Nepal The leadership should not be sponsored from anywhere as it is also the intention of the western society. By creating an atmosphere of internal strife, others may be trying to ignore our independence and ability. This instability is also a factor in our underdevelopment and unequal relations with our neighbors. Because of our geopolitical sensitivities, both China and India expect a strong and stable government. However, if they are always oriented towards instability, their support and closeness may be lost.

It is indecent and shameful to topple the government due to infighting despite having a majority with one's own party, and to beg other parties for leadership is a gross violation of democracy and even a crime. With a popular vote for a stable and strong government, intensive cleansing of the government instead of change shows that the party's intelligence has increased. As there is no division of the ruling party as per the party act, the alternative of emotional reunification is the most popular step.

Even if the minds of the members of the ruling party are broken, the house must have been broken. It should not be forgotten that even the parties involved in the armed movement have peacefully cooperated through friendly talks to end each other physically. Therefore, managing the misunderstandings and conflicts of about two months in a civilized manner and changing the culture through the path of reunification can give the impression of the expected change.

Collective decision making and self-criticism when doing wrong is the main practice of empowering the party system of socialist power. Therefore, instead of ridiculing the world by insulting the public opinion, we should move forward in a different vein by making new equations, rules, conduct and codes of conduct of the party and government within the party, including pleading for the past Is beneficial.

Weaknesses have come from everyone. Even if the leadership explains that it is easy for them to spread a favorable message to the party cadres or members, the understanding of the common people is different. In electoral practice, our society is a safe, not a buffer, but a swing (more variable and unpredictable) state. Different results come after each election. There will be a total of 2 million party members from all the parties. We should not forget that the rest of the common people are observing the recent political developments without party spectacles. Everyone understands that a lot of mistakes have been made by both groups, both for joint improvement We have to cooperate.

In order to give dynamism to politics, big parties have to make a great contribution, big positions have to make great sacrifices. Not only the politics of position and power, but also the politics of prestige and honesty does not diminish the stature of the leadership. We must be motivated by the contributions and sacrifices made by Ganeshman Singh, Mahatma Gandhi in India, Sun Yat-sen in China and Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma. In the remaining two years of ending civil frustration, a credible basic example must be set in building the foundation of a prosperous nation.

Francis Fukuyama, Samuel P. Huntington, Pvt. According to writers including Krishna Hachethu, the government has two functions: one is normal routine work and the other is expected work. The parties should make the government able to do the expected work, not just engage in regular work.

The party should be able to give the concept of changing the culture rather than changing the government. The party is the guardian, the government is only one child. If there is a problem in the behavior and behavior of the child, it is the result of weakness not only in the child but also in the training and guardianship of the parent. If the government is ineffective, we have to find out if there is any weakness in the party. When a child cannot do well, it is the parent's responsibility to increase his or her ability and strength, not to replace the child.

According to author Han Hammer Hips' famous book, Democracy: The God That Failed, job creation, poverty alleviation, and increased social security for citizens are synonymous with democracy. Economic development, job creation, rapid and ubiquitous development of necessary facilities and development infrastructures, ensuring easy access to physical infrastructure such as education, health, roads, drinking water, communication, etc., promote goodwill shown by the people towards the party and the government. Strengthening cultural and social cohesion and emphasizing egalitarian equality for all castes and species is another aspect of government. Political parties should make a roadmap and implement it through the government.

The search for citizens is intensive positive improvement in essential aspects such as social security, internal social human harmony, assistance, peace and security and non-selection, roads, communication, electricity, and development. It is the complete eradication of famine, epidemics, famine, social crime, and human deviance. For these purposes, separate plans for immediate needs and long-term development should be implemented expeditiously. It is not in words but in deeds that Singapore and Switzerland should be built. But in every series of government changes, the greed for power and power seems to be more than the clarity of civic interest, dedication and the clear projection and implementation of such landmark steps, which is the main challenge of current politics.

If those who are in the race for change of government do not give some concrete concepts on the expected agenda in a way that the general public can understand, then any government that is going on or is being sought now will be fruitless. Therefore, the party should not only change the government, but also change the party culture by devising measures to strengthen the existing government in civil service and prosperity, encouraging and empowering them to implement it. The government is not small, the country expects only when the culture changes Takes speed

(The author teaches.)

Tags:

Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)